| Walter Chiefs Grade | |
|
+4OutlawChief Chiefs09 kcchiefs SylvesterMalone1978 8 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
SylvesterMalone1978 All-Pro
Posts : 604 Join date : 2010-04-03 Age : 45 Location : Oklahoma
| Subject: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:22 pm | |
| Walterfootball.com Review of the Chiefs
Chiefs sign NT Kelly Gregg (1 year): A- Grade This is a pretty good signing. Turning 35 in November, Kelly Gregg is not the player he once was, but should still be an effective run stopper. He'll offer a cheap upgrade at nose tackle and keep the seat warm for rookie Jerrell Powe.
Chiefs sign WR Steve Breaston (5 years, $25M; $9.5M guaranteed): MILLEN ON SHROOMS Grade This signing was from a few days ago, but details are now known. The Chiefs signed Steve Breaston to a 5-year deal worth $25 million with $9.5 million guaranteed.
Umm... what the hell is this? OK, so if even if there wasn't anything wrong with Breaston, spending $25 million overall and $9.5 million guaranteed on a slot receiver is overly excessive. But Breaston isn't fine; the Cardinals were eagerly willing to let him walk because they know his knees are shot. This is an awful signing.
2011 NFL Season Preview:
Veteran Additions: WR Steve Breaston, ILB Brandon Siler, NT Kelly Gregg.
Early Draft Picks: WR Jonathan Baldwin, C Rodney Hudson, DE/OLB Justin Houston, CB Jalil Brown, NT Jerrell Powe.
Offseason Losses: OC Charlie Weis, WR Chris Chambers, G Brian Waters, DE/DT Shaun Smith, NT Ron Edwards, DE/OLB Mike Vrabel, CB Maurice Leggett.
2011 Kansas City Chiefs Offense: What the Chiefs were able to accomplish in 2010 was a testament to the impact great offensive and defensive coordinators can have in the NFL. Matt Cassel was lost in 2009, completing 55 percent of his passes as he threw for 2,924 yards, 16 touchdowns and 16 interceptions with a dreadful 5.9 YPA. With Charlie Weis, Cassel's numbers improved to 3,116 yards, 27 touchdowns, seven picks, with a 6.9 YPA and a 58.2 completion percentage.
Unfortunately for Cassel, Weis is gone. Weis and Todd Haley were at odds with each other, as Haley reportedly stripped Weis of his play-calling duties in the second half of the team's playoff loss to Baltimore. Cassel will undoubtedly struggle with first-year coordinator Bill Muir; the former Patriot quarterback was already showing signs of regression at the end of last season. In his final two games, including the playoff contest, Cassel was a combined 20-of-48 for 185 yards, no touchdowns and five interceptions. That's a completion percentage of 41.7 and a YPA of 3.9.
Cassel's just not very good. He has accuracy issues and struggles to make all of the throws because of a lacking arm. Cassel completed just 14-of-57 attempts longer than 20 yards in 2010, bad enough for last place in that category in the NFL.
Cassel has two very talented players around him to prevent a complete collapse. Those would be obviously be Jamaal Charles and Dwayne Bowe. Charles is one of the better running backs in the NFL, capable of going the distance on any play. What's frustrating, however, is that Haley refuses to utilize Charles as much as he should, perhaps believing that Charles is too small and brittle (5-11, 199) to carry the load. Charles received only one touch after the first drive in the second half of that Baltimore loss. That's inexcusable.
Bowe impressively snagged 15 touchdowns last year. It's unreasonable to expect him to duplicate that feat - especially with the departure of Weis - but Bowe remains a legitimate No. 1 receiver. He'll be joined by two new acquisitions in the receiving corps: rookie Jonathan Baldwin and former Cardinal Steve Breaston. Baldwin is a physical freak at 6-4, 228, but like most rookies, he's going to struggle this year because of the shortened offseason. Breaston, meanwhile, was probably a waste of a signing. Arizona put forth no effort to retain him because his knees are shot.
Luckily for Cassel, he'll have a secondary reliable weapon in tight end Tony Moeaki, who hauled in 47 receptions for 556 yards and three touchdowns as a rookie in 2010. Moeaki was constantly injured at Iowa, so it was a pleasant surprise to see him stay healthy in his first NFL season.
Kansas City's offensive line remains a concern. The good news is that the team was happy to get back center Casey Wiegmann for one more year. Wiegmann is a declining player at 38, but he's reliable and will provide some continuity up front as rookie Rodney Hudson is groomed to replace him.
The bad news is two-fold. First, the Chiefs still have gaping holes at the tackle positions. Left tackle Branden Albert surrendered 11 sacks (including one in the playoff loss) and was penalized nine times last year. On the other side, Kansas City will feature a platoon of Ryan O'Callaghan and Barry Richardson. The former is the better of the two, but he can't stay healthy. Richardson, meanwhile, is brutal in pass protection.
Second, the Chiefs parted ways with their best offensive lineman this offseason, Brian Waters. Second-year Jon Asamoah will step into the left guard slot. Asamoah has just one career start. He played well in that game, but the Bills didn't exactly offer much of a challenge. With Waters gone, Kansas City's new top lineman is right guard Ryan Lilja, who gave up just one sack.
2011 Kansas City Chiefs Defense: Just as Charlie Weis worked miracles with the offense, Romeo Crennel upgraded a Kansas City defense that overachieved past its talent level in 2010. Though unlike Weis, Crennel will remain with the team for a second year.
One area in which the Chiefs struggled despite Crennel's best efforts was run defense. They ranked 20th in the NFL, allowing 4.4 yards per carry to the opposition. That figure will improve in 2011, thanks to the addition of nose tackle Kelly Gregg. Gregg is old (35), but still proved to be a sound, two-down run-stuffer with the Ravens last year. He'll probably wear down as the season goes on, so Kansas City fans will be hoping that sixth-round rookie Jerrell Powe can step in if needed in late November or December.
A pair of former top-five draft picks join Gregg up front. After two disappointing seasons, Glenn Dorsey played very well in 2010. He didn't offer much of a pass rush (two sacks), but was very stout against the run. Tyson Jackson, on the other hand, struggled once again. He gave way to Wallace Gilberry on third down. The 6-2, 270-pound Gilberry was second on the team with seven sacks. He'll be back in 2011 after getting a second-round tender this offseason.
Gilberry trailed only Tamba Hali in sacks. Hali had a magnificent 2010 campaign, recording 16.5 sacks if you count the pair he registered in the playoffs. Hali was franchised, and figures to be even more dangerous once the Chiefs can develop rookie Justin Houston at the other rush linebacker position. Houston was a first-round talent who slipped to the third round this past April due to character concerns. He probably won't contribute much this year because of the shortened offseason, so it'll be up to Andy Studebaker to replace the retired Mike Vrabel; Studebaker had 2.5 sacks in limited playing time in 2010.
The rest of Kansas City's linebacking corps is comprised of Derrick Johnson, a Pro Bowler, and Jovan Belcher. Belcher is relatively unknown, but played well at times last season. The 24-year-old Maine product stood out in the playoff loss to the Ravens, notching five tackles and two sacks. He'll face training camp competition from former Charger Brandon Siler.
The strength of the Chiefs' defense is in the secondary. Kansas City boasts one of the top cornerback tandems in the entire league. Brandon Flowers and Brandon Carr were largely responsible for the team ranking fifth in the NFL in terms of YPA allowed (6.6).
Kansas City's safety play wasn't bad either. Eric Berry, chosen No. 5 overall in the 2010 NFL Draft, really struggled early on, but settled in as the season went along. He was great in the team's loss to Baltimore. Kendrick Lewis, manning the free safety slot, was solid, but unspectacular.
2011 Kansas City Chiefs Schedule and Intangibles: As stated earlier, the loss of Charlie Weis will be huge. New offensive coordinator Bill Muir never developed a quarterback when he held that job in Tampa Bay from 2002 to 2008, so it's likely that Matt Cassel, and consequently the offense as a whole, will regress this season.
The Chiefs brought back the Arrowhead magic that was missing between the 2007 and 2009 seasons. In that span, Kansas City was 4-20 as a host. In 2010, that record was 7-2, though one of the two losses was to Baltimore in the playoffs.
Here's a dubious Todd Haley stat: In his two years with the Chiefs, he is 3-7 after Dec. 5. That obviously has to improve.
The Chiefs had that Dexter McCluster punt return for a touchdown in the opener against San Diego, but didn't score again on special teams after that. Javier Arenas' 8.3 punt return average was disappointing.
Kicker Ryan Succop drilled 25-of-29 attempts as a rookie in 2009, but was just 20-of-26 last year. He was just 1-of-3 from 50-plus. Meanwhile, punter Dustin Colquitt was solid, maintaining a 44.4 average with 33-of-88 attempts inside the 20.
Kansas City feasted on a ridiculously easy schedule last season; excluding Seattle for obvious reasons, the team didn't beat a single playoff squad in 2010. In fact, the Chiefs battled just three teams that reached the postseason last year: aforementioned Seattle, Indianapolis (19-9 loss) and Baltimore (30-7 loss). It gets much more difficult this year. Six of this season's opponents reached the playoffs: Indianapolis, New England, Pittsburgh, Chicago, Green Bay and the New York Jets.
2011 Kansas City Chiefs Analysis: Kansas City overachieved last year, thanks to great coaching and an easy schedule. The team won't be as lucky in 2011. Charlie Weis is gone, while the schedule is more taxing.
I expect the opposite to occur this year. Instead of being worse than their record indicated in 2010, they'll be better than their record indicates this season. Their brutal, late stretch of consecutive games against the Patriots, Steelers, Bears, Jets and Packers will knock them out of AFC West contention.
Projection: 5-11 (TBA in AFC West)
| |
|
| |
kcchiefs Mod Lord
Posts : 370 Join date : 2010-03-25 Age : 30
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:15 pm | |
| All in all, I actually think that is a pretty fair evaluation.. I do think we will be better than our record indicates this year and in return will probably have a top-15 pick next year. But I still have a lot of hope for this team. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:19 pm | |
| - kcchiefs wrote:
- All in all, I actually think that is a pretty fair evaluation.. I do think we will be better than our record indicates this year and in return will probably have a top-15 pick next year. But I still have a lot of hope for this team.
finally someone else with a realistic view | |
|
| |
OutlawChief All-Pro
Posts : 856 Join date : 2010-04-06 Age : 45 Location : Mansfield, Ohio
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:54 pm | |
| I also think we will be better than our record. But can still see us making a playoff run and even winning the division again. We earned a chance to play with the big boys. And I believe we will be competitive. And why is weiss leaving the end of our offense. We did sign Zorn to help Cassel. Who should improve and not regress with the talent around him. But all and all we will see when the season begins. | |
|
| |
RustShack Giver of Life
Posts : 4463 Join date : 2010-03-25 Age : 35 Location : Iowa
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:09 pm | |
| I don't think the Breaston signing is bad at all. I think its huge for our offense, along with drafting Baldwin and now adding McClain.
Walter must not realize that Muir played the biggest role in putting together our running game plan. He also must not know we signed Zorn who is a better QB coach than Weis. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:09 pm | |
| at least you are covering both ends with that one outlaw. If we go 6-10 you can say I said we would be better than our record. If we win the division you can also say I told you so. You have learned much from Rust. I personally see the 6-10 to 8-8 side of it and yes we will still be a better team. As much as I like to blast Pioli and Hunt for being cheap and selling the fans a lot of shit about building a great young team I am glad I am not a Broncos fan. whoever is running that train is an idiot. you got the fans wanting Tebow and all the players wanting Orton. They could and should have killed that whole mess by dealing Orton. Tebow will be a failure as an NFL QB but there is going to be a lot of turmoil in Denver this year no matter which way they go on the QB. | |
|
| |
FatThucker All-Pro
Posts : 753 Join date : 2010-04-01
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:25 pm | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- kcchiefs wrote:
- All in all, I actually think that is a pretty fair evaluation.. I do think we will be better than our record indicates this year and in return will probably have a top-15 pick next year. But I still have a lot of hope for this team.
finally someone else with a realistic view He was far from the first to say that | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:28 pm | |
| Everyone else on here seems to think that KC is primed and ready to go somewhere now. You cant think they are primed and ready and then say we will probably have a top 15 pick next year. doesnt make sense. | |
|
| |
RustShack Giver of Life
Posts : 4463 Join date : 2010-03-25 Age : 35 Location : Iowa
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:29 pm | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- Everyone else on here seems to think that KC is primed and ready to go somewhere now. You cant think they are primed and ready and then say we will probably have a top 15 pick next year. doesnt make sense.
The 15th pick can just barely miss the playoffs. I personally think we pick at least 20. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:33 pm | |
| there are 32 teams. 12 make playoffs. so if we are top 15 then there are at least 5 teams better than us that didnt make it. | |
|
| |
FatThucker All-Pro
Posts : 753 Join date : 2010-04-01
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:04 pm | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- Everyone else on here seems to think that KC is primed and ready to go somewhere now. You cant think they are primed and ready and then say we will probably have a top 15 pick next year. doesnt make sense.
I've agreed all along we won't have as good a record as last year. I just don't agree with you that it will all be Cassel's fault | |
|
| |
FatThucker All-Pro
Posts : 753 Join date : 2010-04-01
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:05 pm | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- there are 32 teams. 12 make playoffs. so if we are top 15 then there are at least 5 teams better than us that didnt make it.
If the Rams won the last game of the season, they would have been in the playoffs. They drafted 14. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:16 pm | |
| and how many times in history has an under .500 team won a division? neither the rams or seahawks are any good. so that arguement doesnt hold water. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:20 pm | |
| and nobody in that division is primed and ready to make a SB run. again you cant say we'll draft in the top 15 on one hand and say we are contenders in the other and expect to be taken seriously. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:22 pm | |
| so I guess if you arent built for a SB run then you are still in rebuild mode. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:23 pm | |
| funny... vegas has the cowbys with much better odds of winning SB than chiefs. I think we had the same odds as the rams. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:26 pm | |
| New England Patriots 13/2 Green Bay Packers 7/1 Philadelphia Eagles 8/1 San Diego Chargers 11/1 New York Jets 12/1 Atlanta Falcons 14/1 Pittsburgh Steelers 14/1 Baltimore Ravens 16/1 Dallas Cowboys 16/1 New Orleans Saints 16/1 Indianapolis Colts 18/1 Houston Texans 25/1 New York Giants 25/1 Chicago Bears 28/1 Detroit Lions 30/1 Minnesota Vikings 30/1 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 30/1 Kansas City Chiefs 40/1 St. Louis Rams 40/1 San Francisco 49ers 50/1 Miami Dolphins 55/1 Arizona Cardinals 65/1 Oakland Raiders 65/1 Jacksonville Jaguars 75/1 Tennessee Titans 75/1 Cleveland Browns 80/1 Denver Broncos 80/1 Seattle Seahawks 80/1 Cincinnati Bengals 100/1 Washington Redskins 100/1 Buffalo Bills 150/1 Carolina Panthers 150/1
9:00pOdds to win the 2012 AFC Conference All wagers have action. New England Patriots 3/1 San Diego Chargers 11/2 New York Jets 6/1 Pittsburgh Steelers 13/2 Baltimore Ravens 15/2 Indianapolis Colts 17/2 Houston Texans 14/1 Kansas City Chiefs 20/1 Miami Dolphins 28/1 Oakland Raiders 33/1 Jacksonville Jaguars 35/1 Tennessee Titans 35/1 Cleveland Browns 40/1 Denver Broncos 40/1 Cincinnati Bengals 50/1 Buffalo Bills 75/1
9:00pOdds to win the 2012 NFC Conference All wagers have action.
| |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:28 pm | |
| the lions get better odds. I couldnt even believe that. | |
|
| |
FatThucker All-Pro
Posts : 753 Join date : 2010-04-01
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:12 pm | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- and how many times in history has an under .500 team won a division? neither the rams or seahawks are any good. so that arguement doesnt hold water.
I forgot you don't believe in facts. The fact that it happened last year makes it possible. I'm not predicting it, I'm just pointing out the obvious. My argument seems to be overflowing with water. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:30 pm | |
| its possible the panthers make a SB run too. but its not going to happen. both the rams and hawks are very much in rebuild mode too. so is KC. | |
|
| |
Chiefs09 All-Madden
Posts : 2316 Join date : 2010-03-27
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:34 pm | |
| so since planes have crashed that makes flying dangerous? the facts show flying is among the safest methods of travel in the world. but since a plane has crashed in the past I guess the argument that flying is dangerous is overflowing with water. just because and under .500 teams comes along once every 100 years does not make the argument any good. so I guess now that we have seen Obama as president and seen what a terrible job he has done no black man could ever make a decent president? it has happened. | |
|
| |
RustShack Giver of Life
Posts : 4463 Join date : 2010-03-25 Age : 35 Location : Iowa
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:58 pm | |
| So like I said, we will probably pick around 20 and make a playoff run. Like I said, picking at 15 isn't that far away from making the playoffs. | |
|
| |
FatThucker All-Pro
Posts : 753 Join date : 2010-04-01
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:13 am | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- so since planes have crashed that makes flying dangerous? the facts show flying is among the safest methods of travel in the world. but since a plane has crashed in the past I guess the argument that flying is dangerous is overflowing with water. just because and under .500 teams comes along once every 100 years does not make the argument any good. so I guess now that we have seen Obama as president and seen what a terrible job he has done no black man could ever make a decent president? it has happened.
The two worst analogies I've ever read. Again, I never said this scenario is likely to happen. My point would be equivalent to 'a plane has crashed at least once in the history of flying'. If anything your dumbass proved my point. I've been trying to pretend you're not talking to me when you say 'you can't call them a SB contender and then blah blah blah' because I haven't, so stop making that a part of your argument. You can't put words onto my keyboard like that. | |
|
| |
FatThucker All-Pro
Posts : 753 Join date : 2010-04-01
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:15 am | |
| Who said Obama's doing a terrible job? He seems to have the same commie views that you do. | |
|
| |
BigRatt All-Madden
Posts : 2738 Join date : 2010-04-08
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:35 pm | |
| - Chiefs09 wrote:
- so since planes have crashed that makes flying dangerous? the facts show flying is among the safest methods of travel in the world. but since a plane has crashed in the past I guess the argument that flying is dangerous is overflowing with water. just because and under .500 teams comes along once every 100 years does not make the argument any good. so I guess now that we have seen Obama as president and seen what a terrible job he has done no black man could ever make a decent president? it has happened.
black or not, obama is the shitiest president in history. whats worse? the republicans dont have anyone to put up against the som bitch. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Walter Chiefs Grade | |
| |
|
| |
| Walter Chiefs Grade | |
|